Voters Earmarked Up to $100 Million for Nature. Beacon Hill Doesn't Have to Spend It That Way. Wait, What?
Question 6 passed easily. A Tufts analyst says it's either 'pointless' or 'dangerous.'

Question 6 passed. Sales tax on RVs, sporting goods and golf goes to a 'Nature for All' fund, estimated at $65 million to $100 million a year.
Catch: Massachusetts ballot questions can't tell the Legislature how to spend. Lawmakers can ignore it.
Evan Horowitz at Tufts put it this way: if they ignore it, it's 'pointless.' If they follow it when Medicaid or food aid needs money, it's 'dangerous.'
So voters said yes to something that's basically a strong suggestion. Watch the July 2027 budget.
What we still don't know: who sits on the 15-member board, and whether the money actually goes where voters said.
And that's the part that sticks with me: the official story and the lived story are running on two different clocks. Sources below if you want the straight news version without my side-eye.
What we still don't know: whether anyone with a title will treat the gap as a problem to fix — or just another footnote after the news cycle moves on.
Sources

Dez Marlowe is a Boston Uncut reporter covering Boston, Massachusetts, national and world news.